Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Disagreed. I'm guessing that 99.99% of Switch emulator users do not own the cartridges. They're stealing, which is not only morally wrong, but legally wrong.

Nintendo has the right to protect their IP and they have the right to make money.

Furthermore, I disagree in general that it's morally and legally correct to emulate something you purchased.



By this logic we need to block Kodi, Plex, hell computers as someone might use them to download something instead of buying it.


That is, Yuzu in itself doesn't do anything. You need Nintendo's IP to run Yuzu, so Nintendo should blame those who steal their IP.

Now, the real question is: did Yuzu's creator have illegal access to Nintendo's IP to write Yuzu ?


piracy is not stealing. the potential profit that they could have had is just potential, not actual, so you don't steal money. You also do not steal the game since the game is still owned by nintendo/others. Please don't accuse users of doing something they don't do. Also, this lawsuit is not against users, it's against an emulator creator, they didn't still nor pirate the nintendo content (it can be debatable if they had access to proprietary nintendo code and the emulator was written based on that code, but if not we can for sure say that they do not infringe nintendo's copyright)


Piracy *is* stealing.

Sure, you may not have taken away money from Nintendo’s bank account by coercion/force/whatever, but the company and its employees have partaken into an effort to produce something of obvious value to you, for which they are asking for compensation for you to be able to enjoy, and you’re choosing to skirt this understanding so that you can enjoy their work without compensating them for it.

Yeah, you didn’t steal money - you stole their work.

Understand that you’re not entitled to other people’s work, regardless of what they’re asking for it. If you don’t enjoy their stipulations for it, like the hardware they limit their software to run, you’re free to not transact, not steal the work.


Again, it's not stealing if you look at the definition of word stealing. There's a reason it's called piracy not stealing. You are not stealing what those people/company have (the product is still their, the result of their work is still their), you can't steal what they don't have(potential money). It's not stealing per definition.

You still may consider this legal/not legal/moral/immoral and it's ok, each can have their own opinion on this topic and there are different laws in different countries but using word 'stealing' is not correct


No, piracy is piracy, thats why we use that specific word.


Pirates steal. That’s why they call them pirates.


software piracy means "the unauthorized use or reproduction of another's work.". It doesn't mention stealing. Stealing have a different meaning


yea. and copyright lawyers used this word piracy to confuse people


yarrr pirates stole. clicky clacky pirates pirate


Regardless of the moral question, digital piracy is not really "stealing"


Indeed it isn't: digital goods are non-rival, and as such fundamentally un-steal-able. Property as we usually understand it simply doesn't apply to them. There's still copyright infringement, but "unlawful breach of a state-granted monopoly" doesn't sound nearly as bad as stealing.

You wouldn't steal a car, would you?


what's morally problematic about emulating something you already own?


What's morally unproblematic about emulating something you don't already own?


> Furthermore, I disagree in general that it's morally and legally correct to emulate something you purchased.

Can you elaborate? I see no reason why that wouldn't be the case.


It may be morally wrong, but that is somewhat orthogonal to whether it is legally wrong (e.g. illegal).


You're full of shit.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: