The article makes it clear that Common Crawl is ignoring copyright take down requests, and only modified it's search engine to fake having taken down content.
We got early access to Tinker from Thinking Machines and spent the week putting it through its paces here at Ramp Labs.
We used it to explore how RL post training performance changes when splitting data by domain and training an ensemble of specialized models versus a single model trained on everything at once.
Tinker handled the heavy lifting like infrastructure, async rewards, and GPU orchestration so we could focus on the experimentation loop instead of wrangling configs or pipelines. It’s one of the smoother experiences we’ve had running large scale RL workflows. Check out our findings.
Thank you. I did follow one of those using the same search without the quotes and followed. And your second one now. I'm also cleaning up my X site to get rid of anything not AI so I can do a fair comparison.
I can add Spain price trends to PCPartPicker. Quick question though - do you want the price trends to cover just Spanish retailers, or should it trend the prices across all of the EU?
> I am complaining about the Transit, Sprinter and their ilk.
Good thing you specified that in your comment [1] then, where you wrote
> Fiat, Mercedes or Ford
and never used the word Sprinter once, so of course I should deduce that was the vehicle you were talking about, along with the full size Transit, especially since the linked Road and Track article was discussing the Transit Custom, which has never reached the states and is of the smaller NV200 size class, so please forgive me for the confusion.
The great thing about the Sprinter is that it's big and tall and spacious inside. Unfortunately, the problem with the Sprinter is that it's big and tall, which is a real problem in high wind conditions. Yeah it could stand to have a bigger engine and beefier chassis, no argument from me there, but I have a carpenter friend who uses it to haul around his tools and lumber and he loves his so much that he bought a second one. The Sprinter's not got the powertrain of a GMC Savannah or RAM 2500 or F-250 Super Duty, but saying it's only good for moving boxes full of air is hyperbole.
As far as vehicle turnover goes, given the stronger union protections that workers in the trades in Europe get, not having to drive a busted 15 year old work truck that veers to the left because the suspension is shot and gets eight miles to the gallon doesn't seem like, to me, a bad thing! The most brilliant electrician I know owns his own business, but is driving a 15-year work truck that should have been replaced 10 years ago, but he can't afford to replace it.
IMO, the real question is who's going to be first to come out with a work truck/van that's comma.ai compatible. That thing makes driving long distances so much more stomachable. Not going to hold my breath for Waymo or Tesla or anybody else to compete there. Well except Mercedes, but that still likely to be a premium Mercedes car feature for a long time and not something on any of their brands work vehicles. Supposedly some F-150's can take it, but afaik those ones are the premium package, already have Blue Cruise, and aren't fleet vehicles anywhere (I'd love to be wrong though!).
The way yunohost at least with some apps tries to integrate Directory Services / ldap for Single Sign On is pretty hard to beat, as a feature.
But yeah this is pretty nice looking. Its be neat for more of these selfhosting platforms to be able to better speak to their architecture & philosophy: just digging in and looking at examples of how they bundle / config their apps is great, but something above the source level as an intro would be lovely. These platforms should be more alluring to folks a couple steps beyond simple idealized clueless selfhosting operator, round sphere man.
The ultimate "out of sight out of mind" solution to a problem?
I'm surprised that Google has drunken the "Datacenters IN SPACE!!!1!!" kool-aid. Honestly I expected more.
It's so easy to poke a hole in these systems that it's comical. Answer just one question: How/why is this better than an enormous solar-powered datacenter in someplace like the middle of the Mojave Desert?
I'm used to people arguing for simpler setups because the belief is that they could make them more performant. This was specifically the push for RISC back in the day, no?
To that end, I was assuming the idea would be that we think we could have faster systems if we didn't have this stuff. If that is not the assumption, I'm curious what the appeal is?
Cooling at this scale in space is very much not a solved problem. Some individual datacenter racks use more power than the entire ISS cooling system can handle.
It's solved on Earth because we have relatively easy ways of getting rid of it - ventilation and water.
Within .nanorc you can define different sections separated by a "syntax" command[0] and a regex. I found a simple example for Python files[1], but it could be extended to single types or just code more broadly too.
I've found that notebooks are great for ad hoc reporting and analysis scripts. Once you have your quick and dirty script, it is trivial to convert to a notebook and you get a lot for little. Being able to change one cell and rerun just that is a godsend for getting reports "just right", and the "show your work" and visual aspect make them much more consumable and trusted by other people.
