Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The article creates the impression of information rather than actually providing any. Just look at the bar chart they give:

49% Failed to make connection... but WHY?

21% Loading or off-loading error... but HOW?

16% Ticketing, tagging error... but WHAT error and HOW was it made?

8% Arrival airport mishandling... but HOW and WHY was it mishandled?

6% Restrictions placed by airport... but WHAT restrictions and WHY wasn't it noticed at check-in?

What we need to know the how's and why's.

I'll give my own example of how my airline lost--by my estimate--about 60 bags on a recent flight out of Toronto. I was inside the plane watching the bags being loaded into the hold when a cargo vehicle pulled up with about 100 plastic bins of mail (Canada Post). After those were loaded, the baggage handlers loaded a few more bags and then I could hear one of them yelling and signaling to the other "no more" and "too heavy". To lighten the load, they even took out a couple bags (but not any of the mail).

The vehicle with the remaining 60 bags simply returned to the terminal and our flight left. I got my bag at the destination but a lot of people didn't, and--not surprisingly--they didn't get a true explanation of why their bags didn't arrive.

If we knew the genuine reasons why luggage gets lost, I think we'd find that this is not so much a technology problem.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: