Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

fargo is most definitely an interesting web-app, and i can see it being useful for many people...

dave is a little bit over-enthusiastic about it -- there are literally dozens of writing tools that've been using dropbox for a long time now, to correct just one of his main brag-points -- but it's not a crime to love what you've made.

(nate kontny is similarly proud of his "draft", another writing-oriented web-tool that's newish and attracting a lot of fans with its qualities.)

we'll see what dave's users end up doing with it.

-bowerbird



We started a mail list for Dropbox users to find the software you're talking about. Maybe you'll join the list and post some links.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/dropbox-u...

Note I tried not to be enthusiastic about your comment. Didn't work. ;-)


you've censored me too many times for me to contribute to any endeavor that you control, dave, so i'd pass on your listserve anyway...

but such a listserve is largely unnecessary. it's easy enough to find such writing-tools, just by googling with the appropriate terms.

(or, if you wanna just go immediately to the most versatile: https://www.textdropapp.com; but fair warning, the yearly cost is $32+.)

besides, dropbox support was big _last_year_. this year, something better is now available. i'll leave you to your own devices to find it, dave, and continue to wish you the best of luck, even if i feel you haven't treated me so nicely.

and i certainly won't let your animosity color my view of your software, and the potential it has.

although, to be honest, i think your earlier take -- that an outlining tool and a writing tool are two different types of tools, and need to retain their separate focus in order to be their best -- was the correct one, and your new hope that you can leverage fargo into a general writing tool is one that will ultimately flop. but hey, that's just my opinion, and i'd love to see your users prove me wrong, and do amazing stuff with fargo.

-bowerbird


Nothing changed in my view about the relationship between outlining and general writing tools. Fargo is an almost exact clone of the outliner I created in 1987.

Here's something I wrote recently on the subject.

http://threads2.scripting.com/2013/april/outlinersAndWordPro...

I'm doing the best I can, I don't feel any animosity toward you, I don't know where that's coming from.

Peace..


dave said:

> Nothing changed in my view about the relationship between outlining and general writing tools.

> Here's something I wrote recently on the subject.

> http://threads2.scripting.com/2013/april/outlinersAndWordPro...

right. and earlier, in march, you wrote something similar, here:

> http://threads2.scripting.com/2013/march/imNotMakingBlogging...

but since then, you added markdown support, which seems to indicate movement toward writing and editing and publishing, in addition to the outlining.

further, you just recently retracted the march post, here:

> http://threads2.scripting.com/2013/may/mathewTaughtMeSomethi...

and, as i said, i think your earlier take (in march and april) was more accurate, and that an attempt to go broader will cause fargo to lose focus, just as you said in the april piece. but, again, i would love to be proven wrong. because my tool-set attacks the issue from the other direction -- with a focus on the writing and editing and publishing of long-form documents -- and i've decided not to incorporate any outlining capability because i think it would blur that focus. but if your users can show me how to avoid that blurring, i will learn from them. but lacking that, i believe that (early) outlining is best seen as a good complement to (later) editing and publishing, at least for long-form documents.

*

> I don't feel any animosity toward you, I don't know where that's coming from.

well, dave, you probably cannot be expected to keep track of all the people you censor and block.

but you have censored my comments more than once, and blocked me on twitter.

and while i am quite sure that you don't have any _personal_ animosity toward me, since you don't even know me, the acts of censorship and blocking are _not_ friendly ones. from your perspective, you're probably just "protecting" yourself from us "trolls". but i'd guess that you can imagine it looks different from my perspective.

so no, i'm not gonna contribute to a listserve where you can censor my input. i'll stay independent, so i can call you out when you're wrong, and give you credit when you do good.

-bowerbird


Blocking isn't something I have to answer to anyone for, it's a feature in Twitter that's useful to help keep down the flamage. I think it's one of their greatest innovations.

A little feedback -- you read a lot of meaning into things that are a lot simpler than you think. For example, the markdown support was added because it was coming up a lot in feature requests from users. It's just that simple. Nothing more to it than that.

I've always used MORE and its descendants to write. I wrote every DaveNet piece in MORE or Frontier or the OPML Editor. I write Scripting News in the OPML Editor. Outliners are good for writing.

Like I said, I don't dislike you, or even know you (as you point out). And it probably doesn't matter if you contribute to the mail list, but I don't see how it could hurt. Whatever.


dave said:

> Blocking isn't something I have to answer to anyone for

i wasn't asking you to "answer to" me for your blocking... if you want to ignore people like me who say things that we think you need to hear, go ahead and ignore us, i don't care. heck, that's the reason why so many people ignore _you_, dave.

> I think it's one of their greatest innovations.

i'm sure you do. but ignoring people is not an "innovation".

i was merely telling you why i wouldn't join your listserve, even if i did think it'd be useful. (and, as i said, i don't; i can get more information by simply searching around a bit. and further, the horizon of the cloud has eclipsed dropbox.)

> markdown support was added because it was coming up a lot

um, yes, dave, i quite well understand that it is your users who are moving you toward using fargo as a writing-tool, and that's precisely why i said i hope that they succeed with it, so i can learn from _them_ how to make such a dual focus work.

what you or i _think_ can work doesn't really matter (which is why i'm not interested in your effort to tell me what you think).

what matters is whether people can show me a way to make it work.

> I write Scripting News in the OPML Editor.

and finally, yes, dave, it's certainly possible to use an outliner to write lots and lots and lots and lots of short blog articles.

but that's not long-form writing. a _book_ is long-form writing, one cohesive entity that has an arc from the beginning to the end.

heck, mike cane has used twitter to "write" over 275,000 tweets, but i don't consider _that_ to be "long-form writing" either...

-bowerbird


Is this you?

https://twitter.com/bowerbird

BTW, the only reason I block people on Twitter is if they tell me to shut up (directly or indirectly) or if they make personal comments.

I've now read several of your rants here, and it doesn't surprise me one bit that I blocked you on Twitter.

You're a very inspired writer, but your inspiration is very very dark! Maybe you should write gothic novels with your fabulous writing tools. ;-)


um, no, that's not my account. that's an australian woman.

and i never told you to "shut up", directly or indirectly. plus, when i do use that phrase, it's only in a joking way, because i'm a poet and i believe very deeply in free speech.

also, i don't do "rants" -- my tone is always even-tempered, and i use reason, not emotion -- plus my inspiration is _not_ "dark", let alone "very dark", let alone "very very dark"... i take myself quite lightly, which is why i fly with angels. so no, i won't be writing any gothic novels any time soon. :+)

now, have a nice day.

-bowerbird

p.s. apologies to lurkers, for letting this go so far off-topic.


If you had done all that, I wouldn't have blocked you. :-)


this dialog has now become too boring for the lurkers -- they care why you banned me even less than i do -- so i am officially leaving this thread at this time...

but notice that my participation in this thread started with:

> fargo is most definitely an interesting web-app,

> and i can see it being useful for many people...

it seems you can never say enough positive things about dave.

-bowerbird




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: