France is a fantastic country to start a company: very little things to pay until you actually make a profit, company creation process is easy, consequences for failure are very low to inexistant if you’re a startup. And the state is there to help you get all kind of loans by offering guarantees to the banks for you.

Firing people is ridiculously hard in France. I would say quite an important point in case startup experiences anything else but ideal logarithmic growth, actually even in that case (realizing somebody wasn't a great hire after trial period)

You can fire at will for the first 4 month, renewable once, so practically 8 month, for IT people.

It's plenty of time to determine whether someone is fit for a job or not.

Short sighted / Incomplete. The odds are you'll be a service co, hence, "high" salaries. There will be up and downs in your sales, and you will find yourself in a cash crunch at some point - especially when you are "small" with just few projects at a time - and you will have to fire. If you do that by the book, you wont be allowed to hire for 2 years. It just makes it incredibly hard to manage, hence, the reluctance to hire quickly, and ... the thrive of consulting services (often more than 50% of the dev team are consultants ... ;-) ). It's a mess, for everyone.

It's hard if you don't have a good reason.

I think the economic instability in a startup (a real one) would allow more freedom.

Have been working in San Francisco for 6 years. Actually, contrary to what you believe, there are approximately the same rules. You cannot fire people in the US without reason too.

What about using consultants, it might be easier to "hire/fire" them?

This is what I would expect, but in some places state tries hard to force self-employed consultants into permanent positions (not sure how France works in this regard). And if you mean external company consultants, they are not much cheaper.

I was thinking about external company consultant, since I have more experience with that type than self-employed (I'm a consultant, working for a big French consulting firm (Alten)). Also I think there's more available company consultant than self-employed consultants in France.

I agree that external company consultant are more expensive than employees, but on the other hand it's much more flexible than employees.

> in some places state tries hard to force self-employed consultants into permanent positions

I don't think that France is trying to do that, but it's from talking to a half-dozen of self-employed consultant, so anecdote, not checking the legislation. Still in France, regarding consultants, there's a limit on how long a consultant can stay in the same mission, I think that beyond three years, the law state that they should become employee where they are really working. But I don't know how much it is applied.

Would be great to understand more about accounting requirements, recurring filings, costs of preparing and filing these and the business tax system in general. Also, are there any other demanding/taxis laws for a company with let's say 4 employees. What about sick leave, what about parental leave? What about if the first hire is underperforming, can you easily get rid of that person etc (important in startups with a handful of employees)?

At least in my case, I would want some information regarding that so I could decide if incorporating in France is a good idea, compared to let's say Estonia or the US.

I'm slightly surprised to see that not only is this in English but there isn't even an obvious option to switch it to French. That's pretty un-French in the first place.

It's interesting to read the SARL process and compare it with the UK one: https://www.gov.uk/limited-company-formation

In the UK, not only is a company bank account not a prerequisite, it's the other way round - you form the company first. There's no requirement to notify a newspaper. There's no minimum capital requirement. The minimum filing requirements are pretty light.

The more I think about social security requirements, the more I think they should just be paid out of general taxation and not entangled with a particular relationship of "employment".

> The more I think about social security requirements, the more I think they should just be paid out of general taxation and not entangled with a particular relationship of "employment".

In France they are too, with the CSG and CRDS.

Interestingly (?), courts disagree about the legal nature of the CSG/CRDS (see [0] for some information):

- According to the Cour de Cassation, it is both a tax and a social contribution - According to the Conseil Constitutionnel, it is a tax - According to the Conseil d'Etat and the EUCJ, it is a social contribution

[0] https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contribution_sociale_g%C3%A9n%...

Slightly off topic but for foreigners who are interested, the welfare state (called Social Security, the word thus a much broader sense than in the US context) in France has been created as a separate entity from the Government.

It is managed by workers' representatives and employers' representatives. Since, in the end, it is the Governement (the Parliament, to be exact) that make laws, including those related to the Social Security, it has as much power over this sytem as it wants.

Nonetheless, this leads France to have technically two different budgets - the Government one and the Social Security one - with their own bills and two systems of taxation - social contributions, which go to the Social Security budget; and taxes, which go to the Government budget.

OVertime, social contributions - which are computed on labor income - have been cut, especially for low wage earners. The shortfall in financing has been partly compensated by transferring tax revenues to the Social Security.

This leads to weird public accounting and public debate: for instance, there is much talk about the Social Security deficit or even specific branches of the Social Security (since they are all financed by their social contribution), missing the fact that it reflects completely arbitrary ways to earmarked specific taxes to different part of the Government.

Another example of weirdness in the public debate because of this is the enormous importance of the "income tax" in the public debate, and especially that few households pay it and most of the money comes from a minority of household ... but the "income tax" actually brings _less_ money than the CSG, which is a tax on income that is different thatn "the income tax" (impôt sur le revenu). Because of the names and the arbitrary accounting practices, the vast majority of income taxation is completely out of the public debate radar.

“There's no requirement to notify a newspaper.”

:) what is this nonsense?

There's some places around the world (including some places in the U.S., I think New York is one of them) where if you form a corporation, you have to publicize it in a newspaper. It can be expensive.

This is amazing. I wish such site was available in french when I created my company, you should consider it.

Thanks ! That's our next step. Looking for a way to translate it in a collaborative Web interface.

Looking at the cost of hiring, it's crazy to see that the employee only gets ~50% (or even less as the salary grows) than what the employer pays.

This makes it very expensive for an employer to pay their employees well, and explains very well why salaries are so low in France.

Something else to note is also employment laws, which are way more strict in France and makes it either extremely expansive or just impossible to fire someone, the cost of hiring seems to be way too high for startups, which are business why high risks already.

That's because in France you get indirect salary as well whereas in other countries you have to pay some of those things from the indirect salary from your own pocket. To compare to a US salary, I would personally add 30 to 40% to those raw figures to reflect external costs.

> Something else to note is also employment laws, which are way more strict in France and makes it either extremely expansive or just impossible to fire someone, the cost of hiring seems to be way too high for startups, which are business why high risks already.

No it's not, first there's the trial period for permanent employees where you can fire at will and then once it's over, you can still do it but you need to motivate your decision & respect the process.

There is no concept of indirect salary I am aware of. Do you mean that medical insurance is paid straight out of your salary to the state? This is a huge benefit to US, but only US - all european countries apart from Switzerland have this, and many other palces around the world too.

Or you mean social insurance? Same story, you pay it from the money your employer pays you, its just that you don't do it by yourself - company ha to do it for you by law.

They also created a calculator if you speak French: https://embauche.beta.gouv.fr/. So the employer also pays the retirement, health insurance, unemployment benefits, work accidents and family benefits.

It's a big fat lie that employer pays anything - employee pays it all, from money employer is willing to pay him/her for work done. No matter how we wrap the facts, this won't change. It doesn't matter that its taken away before it reaches your account.

I understand the motivation - people would be properly pissed off if they realized state is taking 50-70% of their income prior to letting them get the rest. And then they are taxed more with VAT, housing, fuel etc. Of course there are services given back, in some cases very substantial and helpful (and in some cases very wasteful and useless), but never forget the fact that you pay for it with most of your income, like it or not.

> No it's not, first there's the trial period for permanent employees

The trial period go both way: the employee can choose to leave very easily. We had one such case where I'm working, the employee left before the 6-months period was finished.

In addition to firing, it exists legal possibilities to cancel the employee/employer contract if both side agree on it ("rupture conventionnelle"), if I've understood the mechanism.

> The trial period go both way: the employee can choose to leave very easily. We had one such case where I'm working, the employee left before the 6-months period was finished.

Yes exactly, that's pretty fair, if the employer can fire at-will, the employee can leave quickly as well, it's flexibility on both sides.

> In addition to firing, it exists legal possibilities to cancel the employee/employer contract if both side agree on it ("rupture conventionnelle"), if I've understood the mechanism.

Yes indeed that's exactly that.

rupture conventionnelle is very expensive :)

i thought the minimum was the equivalent of a month of gross salary

> you need to motivate your decision & respect the process.

And still you can fire someone. And now, with recent reforms, you know exactly how much it will cost since it is a fixed grid.

never heard of indirect salary before, can you explain what that is?

maybe they mean social rights

Very cool ! Seeing the french gov having a post on hn is amazing !

Before considering creating a company in France, check the position of this country in the 'Employment flexibility index 2018' [1]. France has the worst ranking...

Before doing this kind of marketing, do the essential updates first and companies will blossom all over the country.

[1]: https://en.llri.lt/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Employment-Fle...

While I do agree with your opinion about employment in France, that index could also be considered an "Employee abuse index", depending on your perspective.

No severance package - yay for flexibility! I'm not saying you should pay a lot, but 1-2 month's salary after 5 years with the company and 3-6 after 10 years shouldn't kill the company and should provide a respite for the just-fired loyal employee. By the way, in your index the country would get a 100/100 when it has no severance package.

No extra payment for overtime - again, this seems like abuse. This would be 100/100 in your index but I don't really see how it can be justified. Same with the time restrictions for overtime.

Paid annual leave - ...

It's one thing to be overbearing and another to offer decent social support to employees (I find France overbearing).

Maybe the author doesn't have the power to do said updates :). Does a low flexibility index indicate that companies should not be opened in France, or even considered? Your point is totally valid, however I don't see how it invalidates what OP worked on

Reality always comes back to snag you out of delusion. And reality is that France is not attractive. Without core modifications this kind of initiative will be close to useless.

(I'm one of many french engineers who left France to have a decent career)

Same here. I left because France is not attractive indeed. And I also agree core changes are needed to make France attractive for entrepreneurs.

At the same time, the points that OP makes are still valid :). For someone that wants to open a company, social aids and healthcare access can matter. Other countries are more open than France is, but it doesn't make France a black hole where nobody can make a good career. The Paris tech scene is most alive.

You're right that this initiative is one step in the right direction. I don't want my comments perceived as too negative. I'm one of the people singing "Let's make France great again!"

Amen to that !

Huh. This is really interesting. I'm currently living in Paris and have been talking to my (French) girlfriend about starting a business. Does anyone know of any other good resources?

Congrats for the successful Show HN maelito.

If you're located near Paris, we are starting a new meetup about programming and startups. The first drink will be held the 6 november near Bastille (where the French Revolution started):

http://meetup.com/dailyprog/events/tmsrjqyxpbjb

I hope some people from Beta Gouv will come. I do my best to promote that new community (especially towards VCs).

Feedbacks and insights are welcome :-)

This is useful and very smooth. Taking it for a test-run and as this is Show HN I'm not being picky, just some feedback.

On 'How much does it cost to hire?' https://mycompanyinfrance.fr/social-security

* I love that you can just choose one on the 4 input boxes and the others calculate. Lots of flexibility to let the user focus on what input they have and answer they want

* There's not an indication whether figures input are on a monthly basis, annual, or other. This affects the tax calculation: Entering 300, 3000, 30000 gets non-linear scaled results - major

* When re-clicking a field, previously entered digits need to be manually deleted rather than the field resetting - minor just my preference

* The breakdown of where contributions go lower down the page is great

* I'd input an existing French company that came to mind. Finding the 'This is not my company' link took a few minutes - minor

There is a fastidious amount of detail. You seem to have been very thorough e.g. bicycle allowance.

Does France also have tax, social insurance or benefit differences between cities/regions? Is it material? Is it worth the time/cost to manage?

On the reverse side, does France provide incentives regionally or based on city for starting companies?

For the above couple of questions, my context for asking:

I live in China and there's a lot of interest/very simple questions about tax that individuals and companies have. A handful of consultancies put online calculators for things like employment cost online and cover major cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, perhaps Hangzhou and similar) where social insurance contributions may vary.

They do this for free as a lead for their consultancy practices. They don't put calculators online for things like city- industry- specific incentives because this is a moving playing field with hundreds of cities moving incentive goalposts each month, it isn't practical to be accurate.

Are you looking for synergies with not only demystifying social security, but for example 'find an accountant' and 'find an office'. The potential for rabbit holes could be large, but also a very nice one-stop hosted CaaS (Company as a Service).

One nice feature to consider adding is linking to the official French regulations for each item you explain in English. This would be helpful for someone like me who can read French but doesn’t know where to look. To me this would add a level of trust to your comments/Advice.

I went through this process myself recently and found it to be pretty challenging to understand the differences between the company types - particularly since my french is still pretty weak. This is a great resource though, wish I knew about it sooner!

"any idiot can start a business, but it takes a genius to exit one without harm" --unknown

what are the advantages of opening an llc in france compared to the US/UK/HK?

what about taxation?

how easy can I take money out of the company?

how easy is it to close a business?

couldn’t find anything on the website. is there a gov.uk equivalent i could check?

Taxation is one of our next features. How can the director pay itself (salary, dividends) is also on the list.

First of all, why do you need to fire employees to run a startup ? I don't think this is a major need in the development of a startup in fact firing someone is dangerous since you lose experience and knowledge.

France as many countries in Europe have laws that protect employees against abuse from companies but you can still fire someone if there is a reason it is just regulated.

You can fire at will for the first 4 month, renewable once, so practically 8 month, for IT people. It's plenty of time to determine whether someone is fit for a job or not.

If you want to fire someone after those 8 month, you indeed have to justify your decision (economical, huge mistake from the employee, common accord) and follow the process, but it's doable as long as you actually have a justification

You can, you just need to do it through the performance management or redundancy processes and not on a whim. You can also usually have "probation" periods of six months or so.

(also "Europe" is a large place, could you be more specific?)

I am French and I applaud at any initiative to help the part of the French economy not under the government control (circa 45%)!

1. But even if my browser is set to English, I see French on https://embauche.beta.gouv.fr/ and most of the issues on the Github repository are written in French! What signal do you want to send?

2. As one can find on "https://embauche.beta.gouv.fr/" the employee gets only half of what the employer pays.

Contrary to what is stated on the same site, one employee does not get much benefit of what the employer pays for her retirements and healthcare, because:

* if she is hired now, there is a good probability that she will have only a little retirement pension in 40 years, even if the law does not change. (probably close to the minimum salary, at least I hope so). So all this considerable amount of money will be wasted in the state and the "sécurité sociale" deep pockets.

* It is the same for the health fund: What makes the French health system seems free for workers, is that they have a mandatory mutual [0] which pays for most of the costs. The "Social security" pays around of 10% of most usual costs, the mutual fund pays the rest...

Most French companies are trying hard to use other schemes for paying better their employees, for example because they have some company investment fund, but "shut...".

[0] This website is provided by the URSSAF, the French social security contributions collector"

Why spreading FUD?

Social security paid for 76% of all medical costs in 2014 (last numbers I could find).

92% of hospital bills 64% of doctors visits 62% of drugs, glasses and such. Most prescribed drugs by your doctor being reimbursed 100% you don't even have to pay at the pharmacy.

http://www.vie-publique.fr/decouverte-institutions/protectio...

You also have a very simplistic way of understanding how our retirement pension system works and the role it has in the society.

> Most prescribed drugs by your doctor being reimbursed 100% you don't even have to pay at the pharmacy.

Not paying at the pharmacy does not mean that you do not pay at all. You pay three times: Your employer pays for you a huge amount, you pay (look at your payroll), your mutual fund pays.

Most people pay much more indirectly during their life than they receive services through the SS.

You just described how insurance works.

Is it really social security that pays for glasses ? They pay like 10 euros for a pair... Everything else is covered by private insurances. Except if you're worthy of CMU maybe ?

Most prescribed drugs are reimbursed 100%.

Glasses, complicated dental procedures, insoles, ... are very little reimbursed.

The overall total (drugs+glasses and such) is 62% reimbursed by social security according to the article by vie-publique.fr

>Most prescribed drugs are reimbursed 100%.

No, that's only for life threatening conditions.[0] You perceive that they are 100% reimbursed, but thats only thanks to private insurances, which are mandatory if you're employed by a firm, but up to you in other cases.

>Glasses, complicated dental procedures, insoles, ... are very little reimbursed.

Yes and it's often quite a surprise to end up paying for dentistry (which is rather expensive) when you already pay a lot for public + private insurances.

>The overall total (drugs+glasses and such) is 62% reimbursed by social security according to the article by vie-publique.fr

In total € I have no doubt. But SS still reimburses about 8 euros for a pair of glasses. That's not 62% of a glasses bill, and the 8 euros for all glass wearers in france do not account for 62% of the SS expenses. The drug reimbursement look that huge but that's only because some people are with lifelong, expensive treatments (1500€ per month for HIV for example) that are fully covered.

In real life, a little portion of people are benefiting from this coverage, and healthy people are prescribed 30% reimbursed medication for mundane affections (I looked up classic treatment for gastroenteritis). So you end up paying with your private insurance (if you took one, which is not guaranteed if you're freelancer for example), or even your own money if you need glasses or a new tooth.

I just want people not to have the wrong idea about how the system works. You're fully covered by society if you're very sick/very poor, that's true, but if you come in France to start a business you probably don't fall in either category and will end up paying a lot (social contributions + through your own money or your private insurance). And private insurance prices are rising 3% per year. Which is to be expected since social security are in the process of unreimbursing many drugs or acts, alas with no cost decrease.

[0]https://www.service-public.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F21760

I'm not sure what you mean by "deep pockets" of the "Sécurité Sociale" (is it "deep" in the sense that it's seen as bottomless, has a rather big deficit for parts of it, and it kinda assumed to be bailed out by taxpayer ; or "deep" because someone keeps the money ?)

Also, we have to make one thing clear about the whole system in France, that's quite different from other places: your employer does not pay for your retirement and healthcase ; she pays for everyone's. Since you're most likely not retired when you have an employer (duh), and most likely not heavily sick, that's probably mostly "everyone else's".

Of course, the line gets more bluried if you happen to have kids (and get the "allocations familiales", or housing help, etc...) or sick relatives, or retired ancestors.

It's a long, heated, and complicated debate whether this is a good thing or not, and whether this is sustainable in the long-term, and whether the current generation of worker will be able to get the same "generosity" from the next generation.

It's also true that most people find some way to save money "for themselves", and that companies can benefit from systems where they save money directly for their employees.

And, guess what ? As usual, this is debated at the very moment we speak, so expect nothing except change :/

Its not that unique social system, quite contrary - a lot of countries have this setup since 50s or 60s. Eastern Europe is moving/moved from this system in many cases.

You can either save for yourself (ie in mandatory pension funds) and have a risk of bankruptcy (with some governmental cover, but can't expect 100%), or have a system where current workers pay pensions for current retirees, or some mix of those. And all you can do is hope hard that once you retire, there will be enough people working for your pension (it won't). You have to save/invest aside to be really safe in 20-30 years - not really great social system if you ask me. Expect retirement age to be raised gradually exactly because this is failing.

It is utterly unsustainable, demographic curve and raw numbers won't let you do miracles, and you can't rely on pure immigration to fix this these days.

Happy to be in the system which doesn't work like that, I can see how much I have spared, what is the projection for retirement etc. I can decide when I to retire and manage with what I have saved.

Thanks for this comment, it is well written and informative.

> and whether the current generation of worker will be able to get the same "generosity" from the next generation.

It does not work well even now as there are nearly as much retirees as employees. Only debt and the fact we are a huge economy in EU save us.

> the part of the French economy not under the government control (circa 45%)!

That public spending is c. 55% of GDP does not mean that private spending is 45% of GDP, since private + public spending does not equal GDP. Back of the envelope computations put private spending at 265% of GDP [0].

> if she is hired now, there is a good probability that she will have only a little retirement pension in 40 years, even if the law does not change. (probably close to the minimum salary, at least I hope so). So all this considerable amount of money will be wasted in the state and the "sécurité sociale" deep pockets.

It is hard to understand how French people can both have "very low" pensions and then be one of the country that spend the most on pensions as a share of GDP [1], and have retirees richer than working people [2, p5.]

[0] https://www.nouvelobs.com/rue89/rue89-chez-les-economistes-a...

[1] https://data.oecd.org/socialexp/pension-spending.htm

[2] http://www.cor-retraites.fr/IMG/pdf/doc-4099.pdf

> It is hard to understand how French people can both have "very low" pensions and then be one of the country that spend the most on pensions as a share of GDP [1], and have retirees richer than working people [2, p5.]

Yes that is entirely true, but you do not take in account that:

* The median average revenue is around 1200 euros per month!

* The pension is financed partly through the debt (one third)

* There are nearly as much retirees as workers (16M vs 17M)

* We are 65 M people and our "social security" is based on 17M people who are payed a misery? The system will bankrupt soon.

The median salary is around 1800 euros for workers[1]. Not sure where you got the 1200 euros figure from.

[1] https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/3135908

No, that is the median EQTP. The average is around 2250 euros/month EQTP.

> The "Social security" pays around of 10% of most usual costs, the mutual fund pays the rest...

What? The basic insurance scheme pays at least 60% of a set of reasonable, negotiated fees and the "mutuelle" covers the rest. There are a few corner cases (complicated dental work, optics) but these are being addressed. Usually the out-of-pocket expense is minimal to nil (a "forfait moderateur" of around 1 euro per doctor's appointment for instance)

Please...

Have you had to pay for glasses, dentistry, hearing aids?

Even the current president acknowledges what I said (which is a fresh start)

> most of the issues on the Github repository are written in French! What signal do you want to send?

The source of that website is the French law anyway, the code is just for reference, you have to understand French to do business in France.