Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | theGimp's commentslogin

Does money not exist in Europe?


I suspect politicians in Europe are less dependent on private contributions.


Europe has wider variation in political corruption (less corrupt in Germany, more corrupt in Romania). Whereas US politicians always seem to be moderately corrupt, wherever they come from.


Kind of you to put it that way. 'Always' is too blanket, but those who are not are clearly diminishing in number. (They ... 'retire'.)


I'm pretty sure we have that thing here too.


Cheap shot, but I'll take it.

All 14 days of 2018? :)


The article said in 2017, probably a typo on the poster's side. The article is about Trump trying to take credit for this (as he always does), when it is actually the 6th straight year without fatalities. Politically speaking, we are living in dark times even if aviation is super safe.


> probably a typo on the poster's side.

Yep, blaming this typo on a severe undercaffeination.

> Politically speaking, we are living in dark times even if aviation is super safe.

The interesting question is: given the political climate (and especially the President's habit of "getting rid of rules"), how long will aviation stay super safe?


It's actually been six years of no fatalities.


How does this tie into post-scarcity?


> what is population control


The more usual idea with population control is that one married couple will have multiple children. If they have more than 2.1 on average then the population will expand.

This particular comment seemed to focus on the man impregnating more than one woman, while saying nothing about the total number of children born per capita.

I thought they might have been talking about access to mates as a scarce resource, but to be honest that's just a wild guess as it's not clear to me what they intended.


This is amazing. I thought I was efficient at using my browser, but I clearly have ground to cover. Thank you!


The Cuban regime is despicable, but I don't see what they have to gain by targeting diplomats -- particularly US diplomats.

I'm inclined to believe the theory that the damage is inadvertent.


Perhaps it was not government sponsored, but rather an attack by one or more local extremists, of some sort.


Guerrilla radio? Not rebels, decibels.


Often diplomats are spies that operate in a country under diplomatic cover; perhaps Cuba wanted to frustrate suspected spying?


Perhaps a third party not wanting to see better US/Cuba relations?


It's probably in a Facebook iframe, which is a different story.


If you don't mind wearing a big fitness tracker, the Fitbit Blaze has been great in my experience. It's a bit old now, and the new bigger fitbits are the Surge and the Charge 2, but I still love my Blaze.


> the new bigger fitbits are the Surge and the Charge 2, but I still love my Blaze.

The Blaze is newer than the Surge; it's basically a Surge with a color screen and the face detachable from the band (which is much better for charging, as well as making replacing the band practical) but without independent GPS (which means if you want to do run tracking without carrying a phone, the Surge still has an advantage.)

The Charge 2, IIRC, replaced the Charge about the same time as the Blaze was introduced, it's basically the next tier down from the Surge/Blaze.

(Current Blaze and former Surge and before that Flex user.)


I stand corrected!


Blaze is actually newer than Surge and has more features than Charge 2. It's the Fitbit that most competes with Apple Watch at present.


The Blaze still has a clock though, as far as I can tell.

I have a (very modest) collection of watches that I enjoy wearing but I also like the data collection of a Fitbit.


Be civil. Don't say things you wouldn't say in a face-to-face conversation. Avoid gratuitous negativity.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


I wouldn't say things like "gratuitous negativity" to anyone's face IRL. That would come off as annoying at best when two adults are trying to have a conversation.


Who said he wouldn't say those things in a face-to-face conversation?

And what's uncivil about them?


What is the purpose of the parent comment? To score a point? To show us all the commenter is smarter than the vulgus?

It passes the "gratuitous negativity" test to me. The same point could have been made without the condescension.


Yet you didn't feel the need to lecture the parent comment for s snide dismissal of a programming language and everyone who uses it.


>What is the purpose of the parent comment? To score a point? To show us all the commenter is smarter than the vulgus?

To defend their technology/language of choice, who they felt was undeservingly dismissed as obsolete?

>The same point could have been made without the condescension.

I think the "less competition" is a valid point. People that dismiss languages as "old" or not fashionable enough, often miss opportunities in niche areas -- case in point all the COBOL jobs.


State laws and regulations still apply, no matter who's president. Also, the federal government has faced resistance from citizens and states and lost legal battles. The current political climate is extraordinary, but to say that standards are not being held is a stretch.


AvE also did a teardown. It's 40 minutes long, and evidently I watched the whole thing according to YouTube. https://youtu.be/_Cp-BGQfpHQ


He also did a DRM bypass, by which I mean he hooked a power supply up to the motor and ran it manually.

It really is the most ridiculous product. Even if it were engineered properly to a reasonable price point the entire product is unnecessary and wasteful. The difference between selling bags of juice vs. bags of mostly juiced pulp that you have to finish yourself is definitely not worth $800 or whatever they were trying to charge. On top of that they added DRM, some goddamn subscription thing, required internet connectivity, and every other annoyance you can get in a modern product.


I mean, if pressed juice actually lived up to its health claims I might consider Juicero more seriously.


Eating whole fruit is unbelievably more healthy, cheaper, and simple than the convoluted process this product serves.

The time spent setting up this machine, throwing away the bags, electricity used, resources used, etc VS peeling an orange seems comical and sad.


To be fair, the founder was much more into stuff like kale juice and beet juice than orange juice. Stuff that isn't particularly nutritious when eaten raw and unprocessed.


You think the nutritional content of kale or beets increases when you juice them? Source?


Yes, because you're crushing up the cells and releasing the stuff our puny human guts can digest. Raw kale is mostly undigestible by humans unless you're willing to sit and chew on every leaf for a few minutes like a cow.

Unfortunately I'm having trouble finding the sources on this. All of this breathless superfood wankery is really polluting the search results.

http://healthyeating.sfgate.com/digestion-kale-11913.html

http://gi-north.com/kale-good-for-you-and-your-digestive-tra...


The effort to eat a bushel of kale dwarfs the effort to drink 1.5 juiced bushels of kale.


Perhaps, though steamed or fried it'd probably fit on a single plate... and then you'd get the fiber, too.


Supposedly cooking kale will destroy most of its nutritional value.


over/under on the number of features pushed by a board member?


Thank you -- watching it now. Best quote so far: "...the local black bear...hasn't had it so good since my daughter was in diapers" (after he sliced open the juice-pulp bag).


Such a good video. I've been an AvE fan for a long time, but I used this one to turn a couple of friends on to him.


Wow that was painful to watch considering how much was invested in that company, and how much the machine costs. Wow. Thank you for posting this link.


Hah. Yeah, it's quite the spectacle.

I've gotten used to AvE's unboxing by now and in fact look forward to it, but I remember it being jarring the first few times.


I just can't stand this guys mannerisms, and constantly goofing of words. Every single word, is some kooky variant. I respect that he's clearly an intelligent guy, and knows what he's talking about. It's just like listening to your annoying uncle, trying to constantly make a stupid joke.


Different strokes for different folks, I suppose. The biggest reason I watch AvE is for his hilarious delivery.

You and I can disagree of course. I'm not finding issue with your opinion -- just offering mine.

I should also mention I'm Canadian and pretty much nobody talks the way AvE does. His accent and vocabulary are purposely exaggerated.


It's very regional. I'm from Ontario and hadn't heard of half of his vocabulary when I first started watching. Now I can't get enough!


His Canadian dialect contributes a lot of this, dontya know? Skookum choocher's a thing up there.


I understand that, I work with Canadians in every one of their provinces daily. They definitely do not talk as backwoods as this guy. His shtick is just to be obnoxious, and it's distracting from the otherwise great tear downs he does.


I'm quite the opposite; the shtick is addictive, and actually seems to help me retain the info. I remember points he makes and moments in his videos better because of the off-the-wall comments. I even end up talking a bit the same way after I binge on his videos.


My wife gave me a strange look when I told her something was "good enough for the girls I go out with".


Of particular note in that video is that there's more to the cost than the press. The build quality of the machine is way above and beyond what's necessary. I mean, that's a good thing, but you have to stop before your consumer-grade juicer costs $400 (was it really $700? Dang).


> I mean, that's a good thing

Like AvE says, it's really not. Elegant engineering is exactly meeting your design requirements (assuming your design requirements are good). It's far far easier to overengineer everything. It's also wasteful, since all that extra capacity won't be utilized.


>Elegant engineering is exactly meeting your design requirements

Sure, if you selling juicers to businesses. Juicero is selling a lifestyle, not a product. Nice design is then a part of engineering.

Fruit juicers have existed since I can remember. The real selling point here is the juice packs. The nice machine is so that people don't realize what they're doing, which is basically buying pulped juice then letting the machine pour it into a glass for them.


To be fair, people have hurled similar criticisms at Many Apple Products over the years (and more prominently, NEXT), and we do complain about poor build quality of its competitors.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: