I looked around to get confirmation, and I did find some related issues. Seems like it works properly when context is defined explicitly. There also appears to be a warning logged about "truncating input prompt", so it isn't an entirely silent failure. https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/2653 + https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/4967 + https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/7043 + https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/8144

Here is the official FAQ: https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-as... For some context, I currently have 393,405 network filters ＋ 385,476 cosmetic filters. "The current limit imposed by the various implementations is a guaranteed 30K. It is possible for an extension to use more rules, but anything above the global limit will not be enforced. Currently, the global limit in Chromium is 330K static rules."

Do not click the links or allow images to load, and you will remain safe. View the full raw email and look at the headers. Search who is registered for the domain in question. Contact their hosting provider.

4. No, it is not good. "Brave appears to install VPN Services without user consent" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37932754

AI is not the answer for most things, but it's especially not the answer for this. Basic packet filtering is all there should ever be.

Yes, it has been a security threat for years. It's a shame it took this long. In case you missed some of the myriad stories, here's just a few. Sure seems like the onus is on TikTok to prove they aren't being evil at this point, because all the evidence so far isn't implying anything good. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23634138 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29592103 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34109771 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31920756 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28199588 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33280176 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21076459 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33302591 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34098132

Thank you for collecting these.

Seems not: https://github.com/pqrs-org/Karabiner-Elements/issues/2968

What does that link have to do with anything GGP said? Apple isn't involved in that bug; it's Logitech's own software intercepting events.

When I paid, it was with the expectation of supporting something open source. That's why I came to Bitwarden from Lastpass. This is really twisting the dagger in my back. They're probably preparing for an acquisition, since they have hit the same financial inflection point that CEO Michael Crandell was at previously when selling RightScale: https://bitwarden.com/blog/accelerating-value-for-bitwarden-...

Right on that page, data 2022, it says:

    What’s going to change?
    * Bitwarden remains committed to
        * An open source architecture

Not any more, apparently. It's a dangerous move. Open source has lots of nice properties, but the one that matters here is its security. It never ceases to amaze me how companies champion their opaque binary blobs as secure. (Hello Intel Management Engine!) Well, now has joined the ranks of IME and Juniper switches.

Moving to closed source is a high risk move for them. While I haven't paid for software in a long while I can and do pay for the security. Bitwarden stores the information I consider my most precious, and private. Which is why I'm paying for bitwarden. But it's just software, it doesn't matter where the bytes that call themselves "bitwarden" come from. Anybody can fork it and serve up those same bytes. Someone setting up a mirror of bitwarden that only uses open source software will get my money. (Suggestion: if you do this, each to reproduce built instructions that yield the same binaries you are running, and that I download into my various devices would be very nice.) I don't consider my passwords to be secure unless they that are managed by open source software.

The title of this issue is: "Notorious namesquatter is threatening legal action" https://github.com/openai/swarm/issues/50