Surprising the comments critical of how the test was performed publicly equate exploitation with guns:
> How about they remotely poke around your husband or wife's car and explore, as long as they promise not to intentionally trigger anything?
> Calling the cops on a loud neighbor might not be acceptable, but calling the cops on a neighbor firing a gun in the general direction of your house certainly would be.
> Anyone could shoot up a public place... should amateur researches be showing up in malls with firearms to test preparedness?
The lack of sound judgement _and_ arguments is astounding.
> How about they remotely poke around your husband or wife's car and explore, as long as they promise not to intentionally trigger anything?
> Calling the cops on a loud neighbor might not be acceptable, but calling the cops on a neighbor firing a gun in the general direction of your house certainly would be.
> Anyone could shoot up a public place... should amateur researches be showing up in malls with firearms to test preparedness?
The lack of sound judgement _and_ arguments is astounding.