I think people are quick to single out the researchers because there is more at stake when researchers act recklessly. When a journalist does something reckless, it's a problem with that journalist. The Constitution protects other journalists continuing to do what they do.
When a hacker does something reckless, it's usually painted as a problem with all hackers. Which then fuels calls for draconian laws which would hinder future research.
I think it's because the article clearly names the two researchers, while WIRED is a faceless organization. It's a lot easier to get mad and blame the one with a face.
When a hacker does something reckless, it's usually painted as a problem with all hackers. Which then fuels calls for draconian laws which would hinder future research.