> While you're not allowed to turn away from the screen, you could certainly do the mental equivalent, while still carrying on the conversation. I admit this isn't really in the spirit of the game though.
How many people bought timeshare because they turned up to a sales pitch in order to claim some free gift? "We'll go, get our gift, and just keep saying 'no' to the sales pitch".
How many people end up paying for something because they couldn't be bothered to cancel the deal after the free period is gone? It's an age-old sales tactic, used in everything from magazine subscription to Spotify (of not cancelling the last one when I no longer needed it I'm guilty myself).
And I think the mental equivalent of drinking bird is actually very much in the spirit of the experiment - the point is, people can't reliably do even something as simple as deciding to refuse no matter what and keeping the commitment.
How many of those people were high-IQ timeshare experts though, with extensive knowledge of the potential for timeshares to destroy the entire universe?
You would think that the various self-knowledge and introspective exercises promoted by yudowsky would immunize people against simple timeshare-style persuasion. This is why I think he uses rationalism itself to trap people. Like someone said, the basilisk thing seemed pretty effective.
How many people bought timeshare because they turned up to a sales pitch in order to claim some free gift? "We'll go, get our gift, and just keep saying 'no' to the sales pitch".
http://www.moneycrashers.com/attending-timeshare-presentatio...