> I was refering specifically to websites, not webapps.
Okay, then yes, we were using terms differently. I consider web apps to be a subset of web sites (which is the standard usage as far as I knew), and thus I thought you were claiming that JavaScript should not be a requirement for any web site, including web apps. But you're using "web site" to mean web sites which aren't web apps, and in that case, I do agree.
I disagree with several claims you make later in that comment, but since I think I've addressed our primary disagreement I will leave it at that.
Okay, then yes, we were using terms differently. I consider web apps to be a subset of web sites (which is the standard usage as far as I knew), and thus I thought you were claiming that JavaScript should not be a requirement for any web site, including web apps. But you're using "web site" to mean web sites which aren't web apps, and in that case, I do agree.
I disagree with several claims you make later in that comment, but since I think I've addressed our primary disagreement I will leave it at that.