>You're assuming that we know "how things actually are".
No, I'm only assuming that we sometimes know how things actually aren't. In other words, we can sometimes be pretty sure that a particular theory is wrong even if we have no confidence that our current best theory is correct.
No, I'm only assuming that we sometimes know how things actually aren't. In other words, we can sometimes be pretty sure that a particular theory is wrong even if we have no confidence that our current best theory is correct.