Saying a software isn't "free" makes other people feel like the software is bad
Really? I've never seen that, except when the "other people" understand that to mean it doesn't fit the FSF's definition. People who don't know about the FSF's definition would just think it's paid software, not "bad", in my experience.
What software are you thinking that is considered "free" (and not in the sense of cost) by some people but doesn't fit the FSF's definition?
Really? I've never seen that, except when the "other people" understand that to mean it doesn't fit the FSF's definition. People who don't know about the FSF's definition would just think it's paid software, not "bad", in my experience.
What software are you thinking that is considered "free" (and not in the sense of cost) by some people but doesn't fit the FSF's definition?