Agreed, but this is for go only, so it's replacing a mix of go and assembly with... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		slashdev on May 7, 2015 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Go crypto: bridging the performance gap Agreed, but this is for go only, so it's replacing a mix of go and assembly with a mix of go and assembly. How does that make anything safer?

pjmlp on May 7, 2015 [–]

By not introducing a dependency into OpenSSL, which is the point being discussed.

slashdev on May 7, 2015 | [–]

Missed the indent. I agree then.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact