185 ns is worse than function call overhead in Python (about 100 ns on this mach... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		fdej on May 7, 2015 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Go crypto: bridging the performance gap 185 ns is worse than function call overhead in Python (about 100 ns on this machine)

robmccoll on May 7, 2015 | [–]

Python calling Python, Python calling out to a native module, or Python calling through ctypes?

fdej on May 11, 2015 | | [–]

Python calling a no-op Python function def foo(): pass

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact