Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ironically it's the opposite in the UK, temp employees in the tech industry typically earn a lot more.

In context to the interview I was talking about the perm rate was half of the contract rates they were paying people on the same team.




I concur.

As a contractor in the UK, you are likely not paying National Insurance contributions, are able to write off mileage and other expenses, can reduce your tax liability with dividends. Plus you'd still get access to the NHS.

I'm perm at the moment, but if I was a contractor I'd be saving a significant amount of money.


The main thing is that if you are earning decent money, you want to be a contractor because it is tax efficient.


You ought to be paying National Insurance.


There are a lot of people like this in the UK, not just in IT, the BBC, the media, even the government are full of them. They look like employees, quack like employees, but dodge PAYE. They are the problem, not a couple of billionaires with Swiss bank accounts.


If you own your own limited company and received income via dividends, it's not subject to NI.


In AU, once you factor in tax and benefits, contractors typically earn 50% more than full time employees. For a $100k full time role, the same might go to a contractor for $800+/day ($180k/year).




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: