The thing is, ClojureCLR is a demonstration of of exactly what's wrong with the CLR: it isn't Clojure. Instead it's a language with similar decisions and similar syntax but slightly different semantics.
The problem with ClojureCLR is not technical, its just that most people dont care about it. There are some things moving there but not anywhere close to Clojure or ClojureScript.
Clojure has never, ever been about equality between diffrent versions, the were always meant to be simular but diffrent when the platform is diffrent.
I think you're getting mixed up. ClojureCLR demonstrates that CoreCLR doesn't deliver on its intended functionality, not that Clojure's approach is wrong. Indeed, Clojure's approach is dead on: don't even try to make platforms compatible.
With that said, I'd like a better lib story between Clj and Cljs.
