Yes, it is 100% plagiarized. The last sentence in the original text: "It doesn’t... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		acqq on Nov 6, 2014 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why Intel is adding instructions to speed up non-v... Yes, it is 100% plagiarized. The last sentence in the original text: "It doesn’t directly address the OS overhead issue, but that can, to a large extent, be worked around without extra hardware." Their modification: "It doesn’t directly address the OS overhead issue, but that can, to an astronomically immense extent, be worked around without extra hardware."

8957a7e86 on Nov 6, 2014 [–]

It looks like the original text was automatically processed by replacing various words by their synonyms from a thesaurus, leading to hilariously non-idiomatic prose.

rbanffy on Nov 6, 2014 | [–]

Artificial Awkwardness. It was bound to happen.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact