The Angel band (http://www.angelsensor.com/) looks like it should be out in a few months, from their updates they're doing FCC/CE testing now.
The nice difference between all the other bands is they aren't selling an ecosystem, it's designed to be fully open for people to write their owns apps to interface with their data.
(I'm not related to this apart from being a backer on indiegogo)
It's also an order of magnitude more accurate (source: testing my Polar H7 and my Moto 360) Current optical HRMs seem to peak out in intense activity, which is exactly when they're most useful.
The whole bunch seem good for general fitness, but not for athletic performance. For that a chest band still can't be beat.
And this, to me, makes them almost useless. That said, there are optical HRMs that are accurate and aimed at athletes, but ... they're aimed at athletes. Fitbit/Jawbone/etc aren't.
Agreed. It seems to have everything, but at the cost of being very bulky and uncomfortable. At first I thought the Microsoft Band was going to be an iPod moment for Microsoft, but I really don't think so anymore. After trying on a Moto 360 at a Best Buy, I realized how much more comfortable it is for all-day usage.
Frankly the technology is just not there right now for a true smartwatch/fitness tracker hybrid.
- Microsoft Band / $200 (available)
- Basis Peak / $200 (November)
- Jawbone UP3 / $180 (soon.. probably before Christmas)
- Apple Watch / $350 (2015..)