Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I like this - you can make sure something isn't named in subsequent code while still allowing it to be used. Ideally there could be some mechanism to statically assert that it is destroyed by some particular point, though I'm not sure what that should look like (I guess that's just making the lifetime explicit?).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: