>There is so much life someone can live in 65 years. Do we really need more?
Can't you just replace 65 with 55 and say the same thing? 55 with 45? 45 with 35?
Conversely, if I can live through so much life in 65 years, couldn't I live through more in 75? 85? 95? Given n years of healthy, productive life, at what point does the n+1th year of healthy productive life give you a negative marginal value?
Can't you just replace 65 with 55 and say the same thing? 55 with 45? 45 with 35?
Conversely, if I can live through so much life in 65 years, couldn't I live through more in 75? 85? 95? Given n years of healthy, productive life, at what point does the n+1th year of healthy productive life give you a negative marginal value?