Sure, but that still doesn't explain it. Under the hierarchy, Junior would still... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		mynameisvlad on June 18, 2014 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: The Google career path, Part 3: Performance review... Sure, but that still doesn't explain it. Under the hierarchy, Junior would still be peers with Senior, and they would be under a manager. It's not like each person can only have one person under them.

walshemj on June 18, 2014 [–]

err no - not in some cultures its like the civil service used to be in the 50's where her where rules about who could have a chair with arms.

Check out workplace on stack exchange a lot of the questions are about friction between juniors and seniors.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact