Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

1) the majority of the population would just sit at home, either in front of the TV or on drugs. For one of two reasons : disappointment in their own abilities or because they just don't aspire to anything else.

I think you'll agree this is undesirable, so how would you prevent it ?

2) Look at a few rich kids in college/university who are doing this now. There's two problems :

a) what they find important is worthless (e.g. nobody will ever design, say, an xbox, or a tesla in a society like this. But we'll know a hell of a lot more about theoretical matrix multiplication. No implementations whatsoever, of course)

b) the few that do have worthwhile pursuits don't get any more funding than the worthless ones (e.g. kiva systems got started as a university project, but they couldn't even build a single robot. In a society like the one you're describing that would have been it. Yet from this perspective they made inventory management less human-intensive, which from this perspective would be really good)

3) what about the jobs that need doing, but nobody wants to do. Garbage collection is the poster-child here, but it's not alone. Mining. Sailing cargo ships across oceans. Crew members on ships. Oil drilling. Calling library patrons threatening them into returning books.

How and why would these jobs get done ?



1/ I think you're right, many people will sit at home, but this is their choice and I'm personally OK with it.

2/ Don't agree many inventions are serendipitous http://www.geniusstuff.com/blog/list/10-accidental-invention...

3/ If robots can't do these jobs, wages will rise until somebody is incentivised to do them


Unless the drug "Soma" exists (from Huxley's Brave New World).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: