ironing: https://twitter.com/danbarker/status/439125570115223552

apta · on April 29, 2014

I don't get it. It's just scraping wikipedia to come up with that definition...

scottydelta · on April 29, 2014

The thing is google asked people to report URLs that were scraping sites and were outranking original sources, so this guy posted a snapshot where google was scraping wikipedia to come up with definition of 'scraper site' and was outranking wikipedia. :P

02 · on April 30, 2014

Wikipedia content is licensed for redistribution. That isn't scraping.

chrisBob · on April 30, 2014

And as a site that is funded by donations not ad revenue they probably consider this a service.

scottydelta · on April 30, 2014

yes, Wikipedia content is licensed for redistribution but the point here was websites outranking the original sources.