Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How does TimSort improve (if at all) on what is published on the topic in academia?



Here's another link to the documentation (since svn.python.org is not responding for me): http://bugs.python.org/file4451/timsort.txt

TimSort is essentially merge sort plus optimizations. The major optimization is that it identifies already-sorted subsequences within the input, and sorts these "runs" plus some surrounding elements using a fast binary insertion sort. This means that for input that isn't completely random, it doesn't need to do as many comparisons as a pure mergesort. TimSort has also been tuned based on empirical testing on real-world data/hardware.


Adaptive sorting has been studied in academia:

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.45.8...


Academic work on subjects like sorting tends to focus more on things like big-O runtimes and less on implementation details that lead to reducing the various constants that big-O simplifies out, or that arise from real-world data patterns rather than totally randomized or idealized data.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: