Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

LISP: awful for developers, good for the compiler -> machine (fast)

It's pretty funny that the knee-jerk dismissals of Lisp today are the precise opposite of what they used to be.



Knee-jerk? There's nothing pretty about having every single semantic of your language need to wrap. That's called, syntax hell. And it's useful for when you want to refer the AST self-referentially, like in live editors, ie. emacs & overtone (music production.) Otherwise, it's water trash. Maybe it was cool in the 80s when the only other kid on the block was Fortran or QBasic - but we have better languages now, so we don't need to write our program as a big nested list..we can make it easier for ourselves, and we can be way more productive..well unless..we're some old dude from the 80s..that's stuck on the LISP bandwagon. tears


o.O


Damn straight, I went there. And got no replies. Because there's really no good reasons to defend LISP's horrible syntax in non-live programming use-cases.


Strongly disagree.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: