Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Those examples are a joke. What about the volatility of big cap vs small cap stocks. Isn't that more relevant than suitors and relationships?


1. The point on suitors and relationships was meant as a joke but is a relatively easier example to use when explaining a concept to the layman.

2. Big cap vs Small Cap != Necessarily More Relevant (its relevant to the principle of volatility, but requires more complex understanding. This understanding is absent for the OP of comment thread I replied to - to explain further the presence of market makers, prop desks/professional traders, institutional block trades, quant. systems, availability to borrow shares to short, short sqeezes etc. that are present in large cap equities/futures/opts markets reduce volatility and skew the data towards the hypothesis that more owners reduces volatility. A number of these influencer's make the topic relatively more complex to understand for a layman and the people who feed them information aka news media).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: