Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> This should be fixed the old-fashioned way: By cutting off teh flow of money at the source. When clients are caught directly or indirectly using sock-puppetry and astroturfing on Wikipedia, banners should be added to the affected pages naming and shaming the clients.

So, you're saying instead I would just hire these firms to edit the pages of my competitors?



You misunderstand. If you did that then your name would appear on the competitors pages as the funder of edits to that page.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: