The number is far too large to have an SI name. Some people have put forward suggestions for new prefixes, but they wouldn't help you understand the number.
Edit: I suppose you could say 1 exayottayottabit, or 100 pebiyobiyobibytes, per cc.
And yes, this relies on using qubits for storage, in greater densities than is achievable.
Edit: I suppose you could say 1 exayottayottabit, or 100 pebiyobiyobibytes, per cc.
And yes, this relies on using qubits for storage, in greater densities than is achievable.