Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The number is far too large to have an SI name. Some people have put forward suggestions for new prefixes, but they wouldn't help you understand the number.

Edit: I suppose you could say 1 exayottayottabit, or 100 pebiyobiyobibytes, per cc.

And yes, this relies on using qubits for storage, in greater densities than is achievable.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: