Did Scribd get 'better' in an empirical performance comparison with google's viewer?
For me to take such a comparison seriously, you need to present evidence to us transparently, with the understanding that every such comparison inevitably relies on making choices and is hence only meaningful insofar as those choices can be seen and understood by the reader
For me to take such a comparison seriously, you need to present evidence to us transparently, with the understanding that every such comparison inevitably relies on making choices and is hence only meaningful insofar as those choices can be seen and understood by the reader