> You said: Their servers are located in the US according to the article.
So, the servers location have nothing to do with whether the company is American or not. And while that might have a bearing on certain facets of the topic as a whole, it's meaningless in this context. Basically, what you said does not change anything.
You mean, not the first point brought up by the GP, was which to say wrongly that it was an American company?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if Fastmail moved servers outside the US, then it would be in a better position as a non-US company than if it was a US company with servers outside the US?
Despite what some might believe, where a company operates from is actually important, regardless of where the servers are hosted.
So then why was it the first point in the GPs post? And the fact that it's not American means that it could offer hosting outside of America and provide better protection than an American company hosting outside of America.
Believing that it being an American company or not is not important is silly.