Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

So true.

All kinds of work would benefit from being restated in terms of goals rather than specific tasks.




And that's something that frequently ends up being overlooked in discussions like this. Software development isn't special because you need to state it in terms of goals. Yet you don't see people telling surgeons "you should avoid operating on people" or architects "you should avoid putting unnecessary stuff in and on your buildings".

What makes software development special is the perceived comparative ease of doing the work: you just sit down and code. There's no risk someone's blood will get septic just because you sat down to code. One of the consequences of this is that eager, novice coders will churn out code they could avoid, because it's cool.

Cautioning coders to avoid unnecessary coding is good, as long as you don't start forgetting that there's necessary coding, too and that writing that code does, indeed, add value.


I am not sure about your two non-coding examples.

There is a lot of effort expended to find non-surgical alternatives to many health conditions. Insurance companies in effect tell surgeons "you should avoid operating on people for this condition unless these other approaches have been tried first" in their reimbursement guidelines.

And the architect Mies van Der Rohe is famous for his precept that "less is more."


There is a lot of effort expended to find non-surgical alternatives to many health conditions. Insurance companies in effect tell surgeons "you should avoid operating on people for this condition unless these other approaches have been tried first" in their reimbursement guidelines.

As far as I can tell, not true in practice. For example see http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2007/0710.brownlee... for some of the history of the attempts to bring sanity to back surgery.

As for insurance companies, they have some interesting perverse incentives going forward. Obama's health care plan says that they have to spend most of the money they bring in on medical care. This is intended to keep them from causing too much overhead. However the flip side is that the potential profit the company and top executives make is directly tied to how much medical care they get people to have, with the costs passed on to companies and consumers who are now legally required to buy insurance.

They will be very interested in making sure that the cost of medical care grows at a known rate. The growth being so that they can make more money. The known rate being so that they actually can make money. They will give public lip service to cost saving measures. But privately that isn't their incentive, and they are smart enough to know it.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: