Not quite. He's saying that people who think Ruby is slow are often people who have no idea how to performance-tune it.

Well, more of the time it's because Ruby actually is, in fact, slow.

I though the implementations were slow or fast, not the languages.

Typically a language is considered slow or fast based on it's most popular implementation, sadly.

Agreed, but it is still an implementation issue, because one can eventually discover ways to optimize such cases without changing the language.

Ruby is not, in fact, slow. This myth has been debunked so many times that I'll just leave the googling to you as an exercise.