I don't buy the claim that process isolation is superseded by NaCl-style validat... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		aristidb on Feb 25, 2013 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: A closer look at the performance of Google Chrome I don't buy the claim that process isolation is superseded by NaCl-style validation.

cpleppert on Feb 25, 2013 [–]

I agree... You can only validate what is presented to you; a hacker won't kindly hand you a piece of code to run after exploited a hole and ask you to verify it.

It also rather circuitous, browsers already verify what they are executing.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact