That actual page isn't using it, is it? Is there a demo up somewhere? I had to clone it to take a look.
Nice and simple - it's hard to judge behaviour without seeing a bit of content or blocks, or something. Suggest you add a little more to the example (eg http://960.gs/demo.html).
It's good to have light example like this to work from. I find things like bootstrap to be completely unapproachable. I spend so much time looking through their src to get slightly non-standard behaviours that it's almost always easier to write my own.
If you spend 1 hour to code something, and deem it worthy of HN, fine. The users here can decide whether or not it is good.
Now, if you code something that is itself implied to be a demo... and it isn't, because you haven't had the time? It's a bit misleading, and maybe even disingenuous.
I wish I had enough karma to downvote the post (as it is now).
edit: So, all in all, it's nice work. But keep in mind you are linking to a page that does not demo it (convention for these things is that it does), or mention that it uses a different grid layout framework. Also, the demo provided doesn't seem to work in Opera 12.11 1661.
Nice and simple - it's hard to judge behaviour without seeing a bit of content or blocks, or something. Suggest you add a little more to the example (eg http://960.gs/demo.html).
It's good to have light example like this to work from. I find things like bootstrap to be completely unapproachable. I spend so much time looking through their src to get slightly non-standard behaviours that it's almost always easier to write my own.