Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The average, or even more-complex-than-average, alternative language. He's right, the grammar is a complete pig.



Example? I don't understand what is meant by this.



One of my favorite things about Python 3 is that the grammar actually got smaller: http://docs.python.org/3/reference/grammar.html

It's only three lines, but still.


It seems that Ruby uses GNU Bison:

http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/parse.y?vi...

It is not so clear for documentation purposes, but grammar rules are in between 850-4988 lines.

File/Line size does not tell much about Grammar complexity, but anyway, the whole parse.y file is bigger than cpython/Parser directory. BTW, Ruby's parse.y file is just the input to Bison.


When he says the complex grammar is a barrier to entry for implementation I think he is referring not to the difficulty of writing code in Ruby, but to the difficulty of writing a Ruby interpreter.


What is meant is that Ruby is difficult to parse compared to most languages. By comparison Lisp is easy to parse




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: