Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why is an about-face over the course of at least 10 years amusing (I presume in a sarcastic way)?

In 10 years, even crowds of people learn about the medium-term implications of legal doctrines. 10 years ago the implications of software or business method patents weren't all that obvious. Only a few radicals were warning against them - someone sold everybody else on an emotional basis.

"Intellectual Property" in haste, repent at leisure, as Ben Franklin might have written, if he had understood the implications 200+ years ago.




I think that's a bit of historical revisionism right there. Nobody sold Silicon Valley 1.0 on IP protection "on an emotional basis." The companies were just tired of doing free R&D for the Chinese.


> The companies were just tired of doing free R&D for the Chinese.

And thanks to software patents and copyright that's finally over.


Well, since the empirical evidence is completely against it, "Intellectual Property" has to be sold on an emotional basis.

But anyway, well played knocking down a straw man based on a point only tangentially related to the real issue. Thanks for that!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: