Pick some sense you're comfortable with. If I sneak a nude photo of you and use ...

JasonADrury · 2026-01-20T16:57:50 1768928270

>If I sneak a nude photo of you and use some "AI" to add a funny hat and then spread it, would you be OK with that?

How is this even vaguely related? I'm a real person, but we're presumably discussing people who do not exist.

cess11 · 2026-01-20T20:08:56 1768939736

And kids aren't?

JasonADrury · 2026-01-20T22:26:08 1768947968

No? That's the whole point.

The people advocating for AI generated child pornography are generally not advocating for AI generated child pornography portraying real children.

Drupon · 2026-01-21T17:26:23 1769016383

>portraying real children

Where do you think the training data came from, you pedophilic dolt? If you have kids and have posted their image online, some dude is cranking it to an image inspired by them, with your enthusiastic consent apparently. Bleak!

JasonADrury · 2026-01-21T18:48:02 1769021282

If you're specifically advocating for a CP-generating AI that allows you to generated pictures of specific people, that's on you man.

cess11 · 2026-01-21T07:52:17 1768981937

Right, so as long as the photo is manipulated you're OK with it being distributed.

Do you have kids?

JasonADrury · 2026-01-21T17:22:01 1769016121

>Right, so as long as the photo is manipulated you're OK with it being distributed.

Moving the goalposts from "AI-generated" to "manipulated" is just silly on your part.

>Do you have kids?

Yes.

tanseydavid · 2026-01-22T02:11:58 1769047918

No goalposts got moved.

A previous post asked: "Is it OK to 'grok' out simulated undressings of small children because the image technically no longer depict them and instead are fantasy?"

And then YOU answered with the following:

> Why would it not be OK? There is nobody being harmed.

nilum · 2026-01-20T23:30:51 1768951851

And I'm sure no children will be exposed to this. You people are fucking sick.