Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Immaterial. What business is that of Core's?

And if no copyright holder asserts their rights to Rebble, then you can't show any harm or bad faith operation by Rebble.

Put it this way, if handling the abandoned material is intrinsically wrong without a harmed party, then why can't you go accuse them of a crime right now and have the police deal with them like you could if you witnessed an act of violence or property damage?

Because it's not so cut and dried. A thing can be not explicitly legal and yet still not wrong or harmful. A thing can be undetermined until forced to be determined some how by some actual injured party with some actual right to claim that injury and the receipts to defend the claim.

So IF you are an app owner then you can assert your ownership and claim that Rebble infringed on you. Even if you can't prove that there was ever any monetary value, you might still be owed something just for punitive.

But Core is no such injured party.

And this blows my mind, after all this arguing, Core actually hass access to the apps free and clear all along. They are right there in a github free to clone.

All arguments based on the apps or access to a copy of the apps are right the fuck out the window. As they were all along anyway even if the apps were on a private server behind that no-scraping agreement.





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: