Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

When I looked for the base of this lawsuit, I was looking for some kind of monetary damage that the New York Times had suffered as a result of open AI's actions, like specific cases where their work has been reproduced or people canceling their subscriptions to the New York Times because of OpenAI's launch. I've done so much reading, and I've still been unable to find anything that articulates this. Do you know of anything that talks about it?




>specific cases where their work has been reproduced

Isn't that exactly what they're trying to find by looking through OpenAI customers' conversations?


Indeed. But then that makes me wonder why anyone thinks their hypothesis is particularly strong that this is happening. To make an inappropriate analogy, this is like assuming that somebody's house has weapons, and so you demand to go through every possession in their home to uncover the weapon. My question is, why do you think there are weapons in the house?

Because they have been visiting your house a lot, and your weapons are missing.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: