Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A black hole, or neutron star, would make much more sense in that scenario than a white dwarf.

A white dwarf smaller than the moon seems unlikely, if not impossible. If it were that small, unless it was in the (fast) process of collapsing to a neutron star, it wouldn't have enough mass to remain that compact.

A neutron star or black hole would work fine, because both can easily have radii much smaller than the Moon's.

Here's an article about that - https://www.fandom.com/articles/moonfall-real-life-astrophys... :

> “There are just so many things wrong with [the idea of a white dwarf inside the moon],” says Romer. “Now, a white dwarf is a very compact object. But, you know — people have heard of neutron stars — neutron stars are ultra-compact objects, they’re a few tens of kilometres across. White dwarfs are actually about the size of a normal star.”

You can come up with scenarios where white dwarfs are much smaller than a star, but smaller than the Moon is iffy at best.

As for the Dyson sphere idea, the biggest problem with it in this scaled-down scenario is stability. You can't exactly support it with struts, or something.

On that subject, I highly recommend the video "dyson spheres are a joke": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLzEX1TPBFM , by astrophysicist Angela Collier. But you need to either watch all 53 minutes, or skip to near the end, to find out just how literal the title is.





Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: