Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Large single crystal diamond, what is required for a nice transparent screen, is still quite expensive. This article is about polycrystalline diamond, which is not really that transparent, but is nearly as good at thermal conduction as monocrystalline diamond.


Your comment reminds me of apple's attempt to make sapphire screens. That didn't turn out so well.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/10/sapphire-...


Apple still uses sapphire screens on the nicer watches.


I have a Garmin with a sapphire screen. I've worn it every day for over 5 years, working on cars, in the garden, snorkelling on coral reefs.

In short, I my watch has NOT had an easy life. I've made no attempt to protect it or taken it off for anything except charging. There is barely a mark on the screen. A sapphire screen will be a hard requirement for my next watch.


I wear mine while rock climbing. The watch has been put through a lot of beating against all kinds of rock. I've already chewed through 3 straps on this watch. The titanium case is lightly scratched, but the screen is absolutely pristine!

This is my second sapphire Garmin, and it's absolutely worth the premium.


> I've already chewed through 3 straps on this watch.

Ever consider carrying a protein bar or two?


:)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: