Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> It’s not clear that firms are prepared to earn back the investment

I am confused by a statement like this. Does Derek know why they are not? If hes does, I would love to hear the case (and no, comparisons to a random countries GDP are not an explanation).

If he does not, I am not sure why we would not assume that we are simply missing something, when there are so many knowledgable players charting a similar course, that have access to all the numbers and probably thought really long and hard about spending this much money.

By no means do I mean that they are right for that. It's very easy to see the potential bubble. But I would love to see some stronger reasoning for that.

What I know (as someone running a smallish non-tech business) is that there is plenty of very clearly unrealized potential, that will probably take ~years to fully build into the business, but that the AI technology of today already supports capability wise and that will definitely happen in the future.

I have no reason to believe that we would be special in that.



It’s in the article. AI globally made 12bn USD of revenues in 2025, yet Capex next year is expected to be almost 50X that at 500bn USD


It's not convincing. If those simply numbers (that everyone who is deciding these things has certainly considered) were a compelling argument, then everyone would act accordingly on them. It's not the first time they — all of them — are spending/investing money.

So what do I have to assume? Are they all simultaneously high on drugs and incapable of doing the maths? If that's the argument we want to go with, that's cool (and what do I know, it might turn out to be right) but it's a tall ask.


Most AI firms have not shown a path toward profitability




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: