> According to the filing, the settlement “shall not constitute an admission of liability or fault on the part of the Defendants or their agents, servants, or employees, and is entered into by all Parties for the sole purpose of compromising disputed claims and avoiding the expenses and risks of further litigation.” Google/YouTube also did not agree to any product or policy changes.
There's zero evidence of this. (And plenty of evidence to the contrary, like the YouTube settlement.)
> He could have pocketed the money.
He effectively is. https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2025/09/09/preside...