Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My own code quality is better with AI, because it makes it feasible to indulge my perfectionism to a much greater degree. Before AI, I usually needed to stop sooner than I would have liked to and call it good enough. Now I can justify making everything much more robust because it doesn’t take a lot longer.

It’s the same story with UI/UX. Previously, I’d often have to skip little UI niceties because they take time and aren’t that important. Now even relatively minor user flows can be very well polished because there isn’t much cost to doing so.



https://github.com/plandex-ai/plandex/blob/9017ba33a627c518a...

Well your perfectionism needs to be pointed towards this line. If you get truly large numbers of users this will either slow down token checking directly or your process for removing ancient expired tokens (I'm assuming there is such a process...) much slower and more problematic.


Lol is that really the best example you could find?


Truly the response of someone who is a perfectionist using llms the right way and not a slop coder


It's just funny because there are definitely examples of bad code in that repo (as there are in any real project), but you picked something totally routine. And your critique is wrong fwiw—it would easily scale to millions of users. Perhaps you could find something better if you used AI to help you...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: