I'm uninsterested in your credibility or opinion on wether or not it's a genocide.
Courts have ruled it is. The world has ruled it is. You can skirm all you want, in 6 months you'll say you always thought it was a genocide. Mark my words.
They have - not in a final ruling, but in mutliple rulings adjacent, provisional measures for example. Feel free to read what the courtd have made public for all to see
Haven't they recognised that the rights of Palestinians to be protected from genocide has plausibly been infringed upon? Which is what was said in that excerpt? Edit1: I'm specifically referring to all decisions regarding provisional measures
Edit0:Rulings are not only the final decision, feel free to chat with a lawyer
What more do you need? Indeed, there hasn't been a final ruling yet. What a gotcha!
Edit1: Also, please understand that the distinction you are pointing to is just saying :
1. Palestinians seemingly are being genocided
2. Israel has a responsibility not to ebact acts of genocide on the palestinians
3. Israel keeps failing at this goal and has even has it's leaders express genocidal intent.
Which is to say everything BUT the final ruling - that Israel has committed genocide - as final ruling can't be arrived to expeditedly even in the face of overwhelming evidence
The ones who made that statement which you object to, were the judges on the case brought forward by the South Africans. It was not Israel nor anybody representing Israel.
Courts have ruled it is. The world has ruled it is. You can skirm all you want, in 6 months you'll say you always thought it was a genocide. Mark my words.