>I don't, because it doesn't matter what the authors of that paper assert / wishcast in regard to decades old admissions standards.
>The only people that take virtually any social science paper seriously are people without science training. Or people with an agenda who are willing to overlook the fact that the so-called science is garbage.
The "nuh-uh" defense typically begins needing some additional ammo outside of grade school. So what concrete reasons do you have to dismiss the authors' work?
>The only people that take virtually any social science paper seriously are people without science training. Or people with an agenda who are willing to overlook the fact that the so-called science is garbage.
The "nuh-uh" defense typically begins needing some additional ammo outside of grade school. So what concrete reasons do you have to dismiss the authors' work?