The company that I work for does actually provide us with our cumulative dosage data for the month/year/lifetime, but not at such a granular level. Do you know of any statistical way that I could calculate this?
I suppose I could work out the great circle routes and the approximate dosage in that airspace at a given time?
For any third parties (I'm getting a wee bit old for these diversions) geophysical survey companies (the ones with crop dusters with stingers on their tails, high wing twin props with stingers and wing tips sensors, etc.) have ongoing globally spread about calibration flights for radiometric (environmental ground radiation) surveys.
The surveys are (usually) 200m spaced grid lines 20km (or so) long flown 80m above ground, the calibration flights are stacked lines from quite high up down to ground level so that the post processing can estimate and subtract cosmic radiation "from above" and how it falls off through the current atmosphere (density, humidity, etc. thinning out current gamma inflow from up high).
Such things, if accessed, would fine tune a radiometric exposure by height model in the same way that using the global magnetic model(s) (there are two main ones) can tune up true north magnetic readings .. it's a fine adjustment that only matters to some.
Some working airport that your cross somewhere in the world likely has a hanger full of geophys survey craft (helicopters and planes) .. might be worth chasing up.
The company that I work for does actually provide us with our cumulative dosage data for the month/year/lifetime, but not at such a granular level. Do you know of any statistical way that I could calculate this?
I suppose I could work out the great circle routes and the approximate dosage in that airspace at a given time?