No, if you're familiar with Iranian history it should probably make you wary of interventionism with the goal of regime change. Create a power vacuum and you get the government you deserve, not the one you ask for.
Say, have you ever wondered how exactly Iran came to hate America so much?
> If you're uncomfortable, you should ask your congressAIPACSlave to nuke the entire planet. This way you can make sure there's nobody on this planet left to hate America's rape-culture-based Foreign Policy.
Referring to Congress as AIPAC slaves is textbook anti-Semitic rhetoric; it relies on the old conspiracy theory that Jews secretly control governments. Smuggling in bigotry like this undermines any chance at actual discussion we might have.
Israel is committing a holocaust of Gaza right now, the time for good faith discussion ended a while ago. Accusing anti-zionists of Anti-semetism for pointing out that the sky is blue as a way to protect Israel from scrutiny is manuscript double anti-semetism. One should be ashamed of oneself for trafficking in genocide whitewashing by using the real issue of antisemetism almost as a human shield.
Spare me. Someone concerned about "double anti-semitism" wouldn't be making allusions to the "Jews control the government via AIPAC" trope, and in the same breath accuse that government of fostering a "rape-culture-based foreign policy."
What do idol worshipping zionist apostates have to do with Jews/Judaism? It's like claiming criticising ISIS sleeper cells is wholly islamophobic. Nazis do not represent all Christians, it's not christophobic to be anti nazi. It's not islamophobic to be anti ISIS. It's not antisemetic to be antizionist. It's not
Nobody is falling for this thought-ending rhetorical black hole trap anymore. Stop projecting your antisementism onto others. It's embarrassing.
Is this supposed to make me feel comfortable about Iran acquiring nuclear weapons?