Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Executives are obviously more skilled. Just check out their paychecks. Each of them is worth at least a dozen engineers.


By paycheck my company's CEO is worth 95 senior engineers and that's before stock options. With stock options he's worth 265 senior engineers! (Or 240 and 670 junior developers respectively)

He's so skilled he splits atoms with his mind. He probably should be president, except he's nowhere near the highest paid executive in the US. Probably not in the top 500.


Through hyperbole, you imply that he's overpaid by market forces. If he manages 20.000 people and increases productivity by just 10%, he'd be worth 2.000 "normal guy" salaries. So a 100 factor doesn't seem far fetched to me.

What strategy would you suggest to arrive at a better price for his work?


To calculate the market price you have to know about the competition. Is there someone else who could increase productivity by 9.99% but request only half the salary? That person could be better for the bottom line.


Meta basically just paid $14B to acqui-hire an exec.


Maybe the lesson here is to be CEO.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: